Uncanny Atlas
Browse/Something Left Behind/The Naples lapstone fall
Disputed

The Naples lapstone fall

ReportedNovember 1885
Published17 December 1885 (Johnstone-Lavis in Nature)
WhereNaples, Italy
DoorSomething Left Behind
Our judgementObscurity 5 of 7

A stone of plainly artificial shape was said to have fallen at Naples in November 1885. Two professors treated it as unexplained; Nature's correspondent took it for a shoemaker's lapstone of Vesuvian lava.

The Naples lapstone fall
This Photo was taken by Wolfgang Moroder. Feel free to use my photos, but please mention me as the author and send me a message. This image is not in the public domain. Please respect the copy, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Charles Fort's The Book of the Damned records the report. In November 1885 word went round that a good-sized stone, clearly artificial in shape, had fallen at Naples. Two Naples professors described it and treated it as unexplained but real. Dr. H. Johnstone-Lavis, who wrote for Nature, went to see them.

Johnstone-Lavis's own letter to Nature gives his reasons. At first sight he took it for a shoemaker's lapstone made of lava from Vesuvius. Its glossy surface was grease and dirt polished in by use. He was given a chip, and a thin section of it showed a typical Vesuvian leucitophyre, probably lava from 1631 out of the La Scala quarries.

From the primary source
"That it had been reported that a good-sized stone, of form clearly artificial, had fallen at Naples, November, 1885. The stone was described by two professors of Naples, who had accepted it as inexplicable but veritable. They were visited by Dr. H. Johnstone-Lavis, the correspondent to _Nature_, whose investigations had convinced him that the object was a "shoemaker's lapstone.""
Charles Fort (1919), Project Gutenberg ebook #22472, The Book of the DamnedRead the source →
Also told in