Uncanny Atlas
Browse/Something Left Behind/The Grave Creek stone
Disputed

The Grave Creek stone

WhereThis has no location, and never had one.
DoorSomething Left Behind
Our judgementObscurity 2 of 6

In 1838 A. B. Tomlinson dug into the big mound he owned at Grave Creek, West Virginia, and said he found a small oval stone inscribed with alphabetic characters.

Charles Fort tells in The Book of the Damned how A. B. Tomlinson, who owned the large mound at Grave Creek, West Virginia, dug it open in 1838. Tomlinson said that, with witnesses present, he found a small, flat, oval stone disk engraved with letters of an alphabet.

Wikipedia's article on the Grave Creek stone describes the same object as a small flat stone bearing an inscription in unknown characters. It names Schoolcraft as the first to study the stone critically. When he saw it, five years after the find, it was lying unguarded among broken stone tools and old pottery. Wikipedia takes this to mean its finders had not realised it might matter.

e-WV, the West Virginia Humanities Council's encyclopedia, points to Dr. Clemens (1795-1846), a leading Wheeling physician who, it says, borrowed $2,600 to pay for the dig, expecting treasure and a profitable tourist draw. It says he had the books, the tools and the skill to engrave the stone. It adds that the characters look as if they were taken from a book on Spanish coins published in 1752. A 2016 article in Weelunk reports that experts by then mostly agreed the stone was a hoax. By Weelunk's account, those who still credit it to an ancient people disagree about its meaning, its author and its date; the guesses run from a Viking Christmas greeting to a message from aliens.

From the primary source
"In 1838, Mr. A.B. Tomlinson, owner of the great mound at Grave Creek, West Virginia, excavated the mound. He said that, in the presence of witnesses, he had found a small, flat, oval stone--or disk--upon which were engraved alphabetic characters."
Charles Fort (1919), Project Gutenberg ebook #22472, The Book of the DamnedRead the source →
Also told in
The one rule

Every entry says what kind of claim it is.

Claimed sightingSomeone reported seeing it. The entry records the report and takes no side.
FolkloreA story carried by a community, with no single origin to point at.
Hoax, provenMade up to fool people, and exposed. The test is intent: the maker wanted it believed.
FictionMade openly as fiction. If people later believed it, the entry tells that story; the label stays.
DisputedSomething happened. What it was is still argued over by the people who've studied the record.
Religious traditionHeld as doctrine by living believers. Not ours to grade.
Provenance · shown like this

Some entries are living belief, like a rite still practised or a place people still hold sacred. A label alone can't say that, so these entries carry a provenance line wherever they appear, and their reading list starts with the community's own voice.